8/19/2009

David Cocks Q C differentiation of treatment to his 50 year old step daughter Flora Wood and his own flesh and blood son .David Cocks has never given his own son a Christmas present, a kiss a hug while Flora Wood has had all these things for 50 years. David Cocks excluded him from house home and heart with never thought of kindness or love for him which he extended to Flora Wood from birth before she was his step daughter, even giving West Backstone Farm to Flora's mother to exclude his own youngest child from inheriting.

David Cocks Q C differentiation of treatment to his 50 year old step daughter Flora Wood and his own flesh and blood son .David Cocks has never given his own son a Christmas present, a kiss a hug while Flora Wood has had all these things for 50 years. David Cocks excluded him from house home and heart with never thought of kindness or love for him which he extended to Flora Wood from birth before she was his step daughter, even giving West Backstone Farm to Flora's mother to exclude his own youngest child from inheriting.Never a thought by his own son. or any of the elite for the cruel and unadulterated discrepancy, none of whom have treated their own children like that in that cruel and unadulterated manner, but were happy to reinforce for their own ends and sneer and take advantage of his immorality, power and utter cruelty and exclusion of his flesh and blood child. Robert Graves said any man who can abandon his own child lacks morality and any divinity. David Cocks Q C told a shocked and appalled  Sir Derek Spencer, Solicitor General when David Cocks child was struggling in agony for breath on a life support machine, "I couldn't care less if he dies he is nothing to me I will never see him and no one can make me ."

 
 How heavy is the depth of this fathers conscience lashing round for any positive reinforcement he can scrap together to support his policy of exclusion, he who treats his 50 year old step daughter Flora Wood, since birth, with love inclusion, unadulterated immersions of time, approval, positive interaction, presents, inclusion in house, hearth and home, unadulterated help guidance and encouragement with her career travels abroad setting up home near his farm, giving her mother the farm so she can inherit instead of his own neglected and abandoned and despised by him son, and all that should have been given to his own son.


 David Cocks has never given his own son a Christmas present, a kiss a hug while Flora Wood has had all these things for 50 years and never a thought by him or any of the elite for the cruel and unadulterated discrepancy, none of whom have treated their own children like that in that cruel and unadulterated manner, but were happy to reinforce for their own ends and sneer and take advantage of his immorality, power and utter cruelty and exclusion of his flesh and blood child.




 When  William Marshell Q C, later Attorney General of Hong Kong, tired to represent the interest of the child he was threatened with ruin and told if he supported the interest of David Cocks abandoned  child who he had tried to have aborted  and  the mother who had refused to abort his, David Cocks  child, he would be punished by no longer being clerked and hence have to leave chambers and his career ruined, such was the might and power of David Cocks Q C, against his own son and the poor orphan pupil he had impregnated and who and refused to have an abortion at his imperious command when she was 3 months pregnant. But times are changing enlightenment makes the cruel and those supporting them for their own ends or being paid to be tarnished and seen in a way of differentiation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeNT9PSXYxo&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhcR1ZS2hVo

David Cocks QC ecological landscape of Fatherhood,How He Treated His own Son with Contempt and Distain.

David Cocks QC ecological landscape of Fatherhood
David Cocks Q C differentiation of treatment to his 50 year old step daughter Flora Wood and his own flesh and blood son .David Cocks has never given his own son a Christmas present, a kiss a hug while Flora Wood has had all these things for 50 years. David Cocks excluded him from house home and heart with never thought of kindness or love for him which he extended to Flora Wood from birth before she was his step daughter, even giving West Backstone Farm to Flora's mother to exclude his own youngest child from inheriting.


But, of course David Cocks of Rackenford who has complained that first his (200 acres from which he excludes his youngest child from, the child he thought it morally appropriate to abandon at birth) and others views on the ecological welfare of his landscape were not being considered. Oh my. This has led to him giving his voice to protest against the project stating the right to people being consulted, presumably as a Human Right. but what about the human rights of his youngest son to share this ecological inheritance and this delightful landscape with its God given beauty for presumably all to share. Yet while David Cocks was cocooning himself in his distractions of his landscape he was labelling his son as someone to be subjected to exclusion. After he made his pupil pregnant and then was divorced by his first wife for adultery with Sarah Childs her best friend and his best friends wife he designated an exclusion policy endorsed by his second wife to exclude his son from his ecological landscape. He told Sir Derek Spencer when the infant child was on a life machine struggling in agony for every breath to survive, the mother sleeping day and night on the hospital floor next to his bed, penniless and distraught with worry (having no family support-her mother having died when she was 6) "I couldn't care less ,it nothing to do with me, I will never see the child, I don't care if he dies." Sir Dereck was utterly shocked and especially that Cocks uncaring attitude included no financial support from one of the richest most cossetted barrister in England. Cocks carried on drinking his champagne, then drove to his enormous house in St Johns Wood from which he prepared himself to drive down to his country estate in order to hunt foxes next day. Cocks therefore had refused to take on the views of the mother of his child who he refused to say a single word as punishment for refusing to abort his son ,refused to consult his son as to whether he liked being abandoned and would have wanted to be aborted, William Marshall Q C who tried to help and was ostracised for this ,Derek and William gave some money for the mother to have a holiday before the birthday because she was so stressed and paid for her to stay with the poet Robert Graves who became the boys godfather to show his solidarity against cruelty and abandonment against a vulnerable child and because he said "the mother writes good poetry"



But now David Cocks QC is demanding that people show him the consideration which he denied his own child to be listened to be afforded human compassion, and that for just a landscape from his farm. How awful to have his perfect life spoilt by the delimitation of his perfect view, from his farm from which he claims tax concessions for the farm business while he gives his wife the farm house, God forbid his view should be spoilt but yet his standards of moral inclination allow him to wreck the life of his child who he wished dead before birth because of an inconvenience, but not his view. He was prepared to stop his son being born, to stand at the edge of a corn field, to feel the warmth of a summer breeze, to see relics of long forgotten pasts, to see the Acropolis, to hear Beethoven's 5th Symphony, to stand on the edge of the sea to read Shakespeare to miss playing with his godfather Robert Graves in his Majorcan garden, to miss his conversation Alan Bennet the writer who befriended Cocks son (and incidentally states that anyone who abandons his own child is without morals and a bastard)"Nominally they are consulting people, but they are not taking our views on board - it's them telling us what they're going to do" Cocks talks of "ecological harm" and "balance" yet this same father cares nothing for the ecological or the development in his own flesh and blood. He excludes his son and abandons him but my gosh, let no one damage his sky line or his view even over his local parish .



He goes to church on Christmas day but doesn't think of his own son who grew up in poverty and without Christmas and birthday cards from him. He smiled benevolently and nods to the presiding vicar and congregation and astonishingly without any conscience of the flaw in his moral thinking, his enjoyment and power and position is all.



 He even told his own mother it wasn't his child though he invited his young pupil to stay with him with his parents while he was married so she must have known the truth. Cock's father died in sorrow of knowing of the cruelty to his youngest grandson and used to phone in secret afraid of his son and wife discovering because of their hard hearts towards the child ,because as the grandmother said "you were a very naughty girl not to abort the child and to disobey my sons demand in this regard, because his career and family must come in priority." Shortly after this Cocks was divorced by his wife for having another affair the recipient of which though he had no children by he married and gave the farm to (except the farm business for tax purposes)these two now fight hard to keep the moral ecological balance over the three parishes and of course their landscape .Cocks adhered to the proposition that it will affect him and people over and across three of his local parishes, where of course he is nicely settled with his 197 acres of landscape where he hunts and fishes .He likes his view and doesn't like the effect of disturbance of view over Exmoor and Dartmoor, and the Two Moors Way, where he likes to walk for pleasure and for sport. People including himself will be affected. But his youngest son who he abandoned at birth (see Private Eye)wont be affected, because he is never invited down there he is stuck in a tiny flat in Camden Town.





So affected is David Cocks QC that he doesn't even send his son a birthday card or Christmas card, to much bother. Anyway there is no law only the law of moral integrity which renders that ,and David Cocks finds writing and talking about the wind turbines of greater imperative what does Michael Moore say on this, and Alan Bennett.Alan Bennett says that only a real bastard abandons and ignores the moral landscape of his own child. (1) Whether this affects people across three parishes remains to be seen, but global warming is already affecting people worldwide, while abandoning your own child effect your own lineage for life and this is afar greater human responsibility imposed by all humanity and all moral law, not just across three parishes.(2) So what if the farm can be viewable from Exmoor and Dartmoor? Some personally like the look and image of the sleek wind turbines, and I do not see how their presence will disturb people's enjoyment of the countryside at all. On the other hand childhood should not be squandered in order that the elite can be cocooned in their elitist The notion of landscape is a material social human process which should be demonstrated by humanity not a metaphysical dance of capital that runs the show and provides developments in socio ideological violence to the vulnerable .

8/12/2009

Eminent QC David Cocks fought against providing for his love child.
By Keith Dovkants. 7 November 2007. Evening Standard.




David Cocks was among the most brilliant lawyers of his generation. His skill at the bar made him a multimillionaire, with a country estate and a fine house in London. He was the toast of his profession, yet, in one area of his private life, Cocks behaved like the cad in a Victorian melodrama. Having seduced a young woman who became his pupil, he spurned her and the son she bore him.

Cocks fought battle after battle against maintenance orders, denying his own child and causing the distress for the woman who had loved him. Her account, supported by the evidence of one of Cock’s oldest friends, an eminent lawyer, former MP and Solicitor General, Sir Derek Spencer often seems inexplicable.

It was a late winter's day when she exchanged glances with Cocks across a room in the Royal Courts of Justice. She was in her early 20s, a bright and attractive woman who had struggled against family hardship to reach the beginning of a career at the Bar. He was 14 years older, already a success, wealthy and, everyone agreed, destined for great things. That fleeting look was to lead to a love affair, but when Felicity told Cocks she was pregnant everything changed: “He said if I didn't have an abortion I was on my own.” And so it proved. As David Cocks QC rose to the heights of his profession, he turned on his child and its mother with the cruelty that seems scarcely credible. Cocks first denied his son, then spurned him and fought against maintenance orders. As the child was born, into a single parent's home with one-bedroom, and he threw a champagne party at his St John's Wood house for his legal friends to celebrate another good year at the Bar. Felicity recalls to this now with a calm detachment.



Felicity was orphaned as a child and brought up by her grandfather, Admiral Leonardo Blackler but he died when she was 16. She was forced to fend for herself. Despite having no family or parental home, she secured a place at prestigious University College. “I had to fund my own way through college. I had this burning ambition to be a lawyer and nothing was going to stop me. When I was called to the Bar, I felt I was on my way,” she says. She was a pupil in chambers at Pump Court and was with her Pupil Master Michael Hymes, future Queens Counsel and Common Sergeant of the Old Bailey, that day at the High Court when she caught Cocks’ eye. He was this Olympian figure, tall, good-looking and very successful. When he invited me out to lunch I was really flattered. He invited me to lunch every single day during the case and said: “Come and be my pupil. You'll make a lot of money and have a brilliant career.”

Felicity moves to his Chambers at 5 King's Bench Walk, the Attorney General Sir Michael Havers, chambers. “One night David turned up at my flat in Doughty Street with a bottle of champagne. He told me he loved me. I couldn't believe anyone so wonderful could care about me. I was absolutely amazed. When he kissed me the stars exploded. I was in love, really in love." When Cocks told her he was married, with three children, it made no difference. They holidayed together in Wales, spent days working side by side and evenings together.

As the year ended, she learnt she was pregnant. Cocks urged her to have an abortion. “He said if I did we could carry on as we were. I was desperate. This was a child conceived in love, I couldn't destroy it. He said if I insisted on having a baby I would have to leave his chambers, he couldn't risk his career. At one point he rang me at 6 a.m. and shouted down the phone: “You have wrecked my life: if I see you again are wrecked yours!" She was not without friends. The poet Robert Graves, whom she knew through a family link, invited her to his home on Majorca. He became godfather to her son and provided practical and emotional support. So did Cocks’ close friends Bill Marshall Q C a future Attorney General of Hong Kong , and Derek Spencer, later Sir Derek Spencer QC, the Conservative MP and Solicitor General. Marshall and Spencer were appalled by their friend’s treatment of his ex-mistress. The two men tried to persuade Cocks to set up a trust fund for the child, but Cocks flatly refused. Cocks later denied paternity which astonished sir Dereck as Cocks had confessed to Sir Dereck already over a glass of whisky in Sir Derek's home "I have made my pupil pregnant." Sir Derek was astonished at his attitude and urged Felicity who was still in love with Cocks and having to fend for herself in utterly impoverished circumstance in a one room flat with no heating, that despite her loyalty to her erthwart lover and pupil master , that for the child's sake, paternity must be proved in court.
    





As Felicity's pregnancy progressed and she was unable to work, she was in financial difficulty. Spencer and Marshall stepped in and gave her £200 each. When her child was born she named him David and took him to her flat in Albany Street, NW1. At 18 months old, David contracted pneumonia. In one of the many court battle is over maintenance for David, Sir Derek gave a statement. In it, he recalled learning that the boy was dangerously ill and taking the news to Cocks. “The conversation took place in our room in Chambers and I remember it vividly,” Sir Derek said. “He said words to the effect that he wasn't interested, but it was no concern of his: that he was never again see the child will have anything to do with it.” Young David survived and, with his mother working as a barrister, they moved to a two-bedroom flat in Camden, a former council property which is still their home. She worked to support them and Cocks contributed to the boy's education, grudgingly seemed. Cocks became one of the most sought after barristers in London, on one case he earned £100,000, plus £550 a day refresher fees.



Cocks acquired 173 acre estate in Devon, yet fought against idea of providing for his son. When David was the baby and magistrate ordered Cocks to pay £25 a week maintenance.“ he said would give it as a lump sum on the 360 day of the year,” Felicity recalled “ Luckily the court said the child could not eat in arrears, and he was ordered to pay the money monthly.” When it came, it was not £25, but £16.24 a week. Cocks deducted tax. Later she was awarded higher sums and, eventually, £10,000 a year. But she says, money was never the most important issue. The rejection by David's father hurt him deeply, she says. In one of the many legal fight, though Cocks had refused to see his son or send Christmas or birthday cards or presents , Cocks tried to have their son made a ward of court because he said he was opposed to private education and Felicity was sending David to a fee-paying school, Hill House in Knightsbridge. He lost the case." I have never brought these court actions,” he said.” He has always instigated them and I have being forced to act. He is a powerful figure, with a lot of influence and wealth, and it felt as if he was using that to squash me. David knew what was happening and I was always desperately worried that he was being deeply wounded emotionally. ”Being spurned by his father was the worst,” she said. Though he sends his father a birthday and Christmas card, nothing is received in return. As a child he knew his father was a keen horseman and took to sleeping with a toy horse under his pillow. Then, when he was 13, his father made contact. He pushed a note through the door, addressed to David, telling him he would pick him up to play squash at 8 a.m. that Sunday. Felicity knew Cocks was a champion squash player and she dared to hope that now, at last, he wanted a relationship with his son. He picked the boy up and took him to the squash court.“ He systematically thrashed him. David had never played before.” Felicity says “ it was a massacre. He took delight in beating the boy to the point where you could hardly stand up, but he forced on to go on.” Cocks took David for a squash outing once every nine weeks for a number of months, then the meetings petered out, as David put it. Soon after this, there were more attempts to stop maintenance payments. After yet another failure by Cocks in the courts, Felicity took David to Austria for a holiday. While they were away, Cocks applied to his legal costs-which were estimated at £35,000-to be paid by her, despite the fact he had lost a case. When the news reached Felicity in Austria she collapsed. She was later diagnosed with a thrombosis that travelled to the brain and he was airlifted back to Britain, dangerously ill. She recovered, but her health prevented him from returning to work as a barrister. She received incapacity benefit but now hopes to return to the Bar. “I had built a career but it seemed every move I made was dogged by these legal battles over money,” she said. “It was just more change to him-nickels and dimes.


One day an envelope arrived hand put by Cocks through the door inviting David to an 8 am one hour access with his father before and excluding breakfast. Felicity was nervous aware of Cocks track record as a father to his youngest and hitherto totally excluded youngest and most vulnerable child. She knew Cocks was a champion squash player and she dared to hope that now, at last, he wanted a relationship with his son. He picked the boy up and took him to the squash court.“ He systematically thrashed him. David had never played before.” Felicity says “ it was a massacre. He took delight in beating the boy to the point where you could hardly stand up, but he forced on to go on.”

Cocks henceforth took David for a squash outing once every nine weeks for a number of months, and despite the boy telling his father he loathed squash and would love to do something else less intimidating than such a sport, such as walk or ride or fly a kite, these were not accorded and the meetings petered out, as David put it. David desperately wanted his fathers affection respect and love but his father never even gave him a hug or even a hand shake. Soon after this, there were more attempts to stop maintenance payments. After yet another failure by Cocks in the courts, Felicity took David to Austria for a holiday. While they were away, Cocks applied to his legal costs-which were estimated at £35,000-to be paid by her, despite the fact he had lost a case. When the news reached Felicity in Austria she collapsed. She was later diagnosed with a thrombosis that travelled to the brain and he was airlifted back to Britain, dangerously ill. She recovered, but her health prevented him from returning to work as a barrister. She received incapacity benefit but now hopes to return to the Bar. “I had built a career but it seemed every move I made was dogged by these legal battles over money,” she said. “It was just more change to him-nickels and dimes. Once, an envelope arrived on David's birthday with his father's handwriting on it. He was very excited and opened it. It was a letter saying he wanted to decrease maintenance.” Then, just before last Christmas Cocks served a summons, just as Felicity and her son were preparing for the festivities, “It was a devastating blow,” she says. “David had been ill and was just getting better. We were looking forward to Christmas, then the summons arrived. That year his father was named in the House of Commons as sixth highest paid prosecuting barrister in England. I was struggling to make ends meet and the summons was seeking to stop the maintenance payments.” the case was finally adjudicated at Wells Street magistrates Court last week. The details cannot be reported the legal reasons but Cocks agreed to pay £100,000 as a final settlement. He later described the sum as “generous.”“ I hardly find it generous for a man to abandon his son and then to fight tooth and nail all through his life against supporting him,” Felicity said. “ But the money wasn't the most important part of the agreement. It was also agreed that he would make contact with David and have a relationship with him. That was what I wanted more than anything, but him to be a father to his son.”
So far no meeting has been arranged.